Adizero Adios Pro 4 vs Alphafly 3

Reviewers mostly liked how the Adios Pro 4 runs, and their complaints were about their toes. On speed they're close to unanimous: softer and bouncier than the Pro 3, a lot lighter, and properly quick once you're at 10k to marathon effort. The Run Testers found it lighter and cheaper than the Alphafly 3, if a little less springy. On fit, the toe box tapers, it runs a little short, and several testers had sore toes by the end of a marathon. So this is a carbon racing shoe for neutral runners with normal to narrow feet who race with some intent, from 5k up to the full distance. It's less happy at jogging pace or under a heavy heel strike. The newer Adios Pro 5 has a lower RRP and more padding at the heel, so check the price table before paying full whack for the older shoe.

Most carbon marathon shoes want strong, well-trained legs before they give much back. The Alphafly 3 asks for less than its looks suggest, and that came through in almost every review we read. Nike made the midsole one continuous piece for this version (the Alphafly 2 had a big gap under the midfoot) and took a lot of weight out. Reviewers describe a smoother roll from landing to toe-off, and it no longer feels clumsy on a warm-up jog. Ben Parkes, who has raced marathons in it, reckons it isn't so aggressive that only elites benefit, and thinks plenty of intermediate marathoners will get a lot from it.

It's still a specialist carbon racing shoe, and at £285 RRP it sits near the top of the market. It's also loud on the road, and some feet find it snug. For 5K and 10K races the lighter, snappier Vaporfly 3 makes more sense. For the half and the full marathon, we'd still put the Alphafly 3 near the front of the queue.