Hierro 9 vs Ultra Glide 3

The New Balance Hierro 9 is a cushioned, protective trail running shoe built for long days on mixed ground rather than chasing podiums. It sits in the max-cushion, door-to-trail camp: soft enough to soak up road sections and rocky descents, planted enough that you can switch off and enjoy the miles. At 301g with a low 4mm drop it is not light, and it is not trying to be. What you get instead is a stable, forgiving ride that keeps your legs fresher deep into a long run or ultra. Grip is confident across dirt, gravel and damp rock without the deep lugs that make aggressive mud shoes feel awkward on hardpack. If you want a faster, grippier racer for steep technical terrain the Hoka Speedgoat 7 is the sharper tool. But as a comfortable daily trail trainer that shrugs off distance, the Hierro 9 is an easy shoe to live in.

The Salomon Ultra Glide 3 is a soft, high-cushion trail running shoe built for one thing: keeping you comfortable when the miles stack up. This is not a nimble mountain racer. It is a long-day cruiser for runners who want to switch off and let the shoe soak up the ground on runnable trails, canal paths and gentle single track. At 285g with a 6mm drop, it sits in that easygoing daily-trail zone, closer in spirit to a road-to-trail shoe than a technical fell weapon. The Contagrip outsole handles dry hardpack and light mud well, though it is not built for deep bog or scrambling. We rate it as one of the more forgiving ultra-distance trail shoes going, a shoe you reach for on tired legs and back-to-back weekends. If you want protection, softness and a relaxed ride over big distances, and you are not chasing course records on gnarly ground, the Ultra Glide 3 is an easy shoe to recommend.