Structure 26

Yes, for most runners it fits true to size, so order your usual Nike length. The heel and midfoot lockdown is secure, which is what you want from a stability shoe. The toe box is medium rather than roomy, so if you have wider feet you may want Nike's wide fitting or to size up a half. For half marathons and longer, where feet swell, runners caught between sizes often prefer the extra half size for comfort late in the run.

It is well suited to mild and moderate overpronation. Instead of a hard medial post, it uses a supportive midsole shape and a wide, planted base to keep your foot tracking straight, so the guidance feels natural rather than corrective. Most runners who have been told they need light to moderate support will get on with it. If you are a severe overpronator who relies on a firm post, you may want a more aggressively built stability shoe such as the Brooks Beast or a posted Saucony Hurricane.

You can, if your priority is comfort and stability over speed. The protective 36.1mm heel stack and planted ride hold up well over long distances, which makes it a reasonable choice for steady marathon training and for runners who value support on race day. The trade-off is weight, at 298g it is not a fast shoe, so if you are chasing a personal best you would be better served by a lighter tempo or carbon racer. For finishing comfortably and staying supported, it does the job.

Yes, it is a sensible first proper running shoe for many new runners, especially anyone who has been told they overpronate. It is forgiving, stable and hard-wearing, and the firm, planted ride builds confidence over easy miles. The main caveat is the weight, beginners doing only short runs might prefer something lighter, but for building up mileage with support it is a dependable and reasonably priced starting point at £130.

Both are mainstream stability daily trainers in a similar price bracket, and both rely on modern, non-intrusive support rather than a firm post. The Asics GT-2000 14 tends to feel a little softer and more forgiving across the forefoot, while the Structure 26 is firmer and more planted. If you want a roomier, plusher support trainer, lean Asics. If you prefer a firm, secure, controlled ride, the Nike makes a strong case.

Durability is one of its strengths. The structured upper and firm, protective midsole are built for high mileage, and the firmer foam tends to hold its shape and support longer than softer compounds. As a daily trainer designed to be worn often, it should comfortably handle a typical training block and beyond before the cushioning starts to feel tired. That hard-wearing nature is a big part of why it makes sense as a value-focused everyday shoe.