Skip to main content
Mizuno Neo Vista 3 road running shoe

Photo shows one example colourway

Mizuno

Neo Vista 3

★ 90d low Tracked daily👁 17 people tracking this

Max-cushion bouncy trainer for daily miles and long runs.

Best price todayLowest tracked · 90d
£110.24£150.00−27%
Gender: check retailerColour: Blanc
at Direct Running · 17% under 30d avg
90D Low£110.24
30D Avg£133.51
RRP£150.00
Go to Direct Running →
Where to buy

Today's tracked prices

Prices and sizes can change, so always check the latest availability at the retailer. Some links earn us a commission at no extra cost to you.

Tracked daily

Price history

Expert review

Our verdict

Mizuno trimmed the Neo Vista this year instead of making it bigger. Our spec sheet has the 3 a little lower than the Neo Vista 2 at heel and forefoot, at much the same 266g, and the RRP comes down to £150. The change reviewers noticed first is the fit: the heel now holds your foot properly, and the length complaints about the last version have gone. Underfoot it's still a big, soft max-cushion super trainer with no carbon plate, and most testers liked it more than the 2. Where they part ways is pace. Some found real spring for uptempo finishes, while one lab measured only modest energy return and called it bulky once you push. Doctors of Running graded the performance highly but marked the fit down hard, mostly for thick heel padding that bothered a tester's Achilles. We'd buy it as a long-run and recovery running shoe and leave the intervals to something lighter.

Key features

  • Max-stack cushioningPuts a lot of soft foam between you and the road, so long runs and tired-leg days feel protected rather than punishing
  • Reworked heelLocks your heel in far better than the Neo Vista 2, which makes the tall stack feel less wobbly
  • Knit bootie upperStretches to your foot like a sock, though it starts snug in the forefoot
  • 8.5mm dropSits in the middle of the range, a comfortable setup if you land on your heel
  • Hard-wearing outsoleShowed very little wear in early lab and mileage testing, so it should last well

Who it suits

Who should buy it

  • Long-run runners who want as much protection underfoot as they can get
  • Heel strikers, since reviewers single out the heel cushioning
  • Neo Vista 2 owners whose heel slipped or whose size felt off
  • Runners who roll in slightly and like a little guidance without a stability shoe

Who should not buy it

  • You have wide feet, as the forefoot is tapered and snug
  • You have a sensitive Achilles or Haglund's, because of the thick heel padding
  • You want one shoe for intervals and tempo, as it feels bulky at speed
  • You run gravel paths, since stones lodge in the deep grooves

Best uses

  • long runs
  • easy runs
  • recovery
  • daily training
  • steady runs
At a glance

Ratings

8.3Greatout of 10
Lightness5.5
Cushioning9.3
Flexibility4.0
Responsive6.5
Stability7.5
Grip7.5

Pros

  • Very protective cushioning, especially under the heel
  • Heel lockdown much improved on the Neo Vista 2
  • Sock-like knit upper
  • Outsole showed very little wear in testing
  • Stable for its height, with a slight inward guiding effect

Cons

  • Heavy for a super trainer
  • Modest energy return and bulky at faster paces
  • Thick heel padding can irritate a sensitive Achilles
  • Tapered, snug forefoot rules out wide feet
  • Deep outsole grooves pick up stones
Good to know

Extra information

Fit & sizing

Most reviews had it true to size, and two said the length problem some runners had with the Neo Vista 2 is fixed. RunRepeat was the outlier, measuring it slightly long with a tall toe box. Another lab found the toe box a little low, so how roomy it feels depends on whose foot is in it. Width is where they agree. The forefoot tapers and the knit is snug at first, easing a little with miles, so if your feet are wide, try a pair on before you buy. Heel hold is much better than before, though the padding back there is thick. One tester got pain right where it sits, which makes a touchy Achilles or Haglund's a real reason to look elsewhere. One reviewer also found the arch a touch high.

Performance breakdown

Ride & feel

Soft first, then some spring. At easy and steady paces reviewers describe a smooth roll forward and a bouncier feel than the 2. Push harder and opinion splits. Some testers were happy finishing long runs at uptempo pace in it, while others, and the lab numbers, found the rebound modest and the shoe cumbersome. It's heavy on our spec sheet, and you'll feel that at 5K or 10K effort.

Cushioning

This is why you'd buy it. Lab testing rated the foam very soft and among the most shock-absorbing it has measured, and another lab singled out the heel cushioning for heel strikers. The trade-off is return: the softness that protects you gives back less than the bounciest foams in this class. If you want softer still, one lab found the Vomero Premium plusher, though bulkier.

Stability

Neutral, but steadier than the height suggests. One detailed review found the outer sidewall compresses more than the inner, which nudges you towards the middle of the shoe. That helps if you roll in slightly and does little if you tend to roll outwards. Others called it planted thanks to a wide base, though the soft heel foam gives a bit. On corners one tester wanted more side-to-side hold from the knit.

Upper & comfort

Most testers rate the new knit bootie. It stretches and wraps the foot, with pull tabs to help you in. Breathability divides the reviews: one lab measured it as breathable and quick to dry, while another reviewer found the knit thicker than before and warmer for summer. Lab testing also scored the heel lining poorly for wear.

Honest reviews by runners

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first to review this shoe.

Sign in to write a review.

Common questions

FAQ

Yes, for most runners. Width is the exception. The forefoot is tapered and the knit only stretches so far, so if your feet are wide it's worth trying a pair on first.

As a training shoe for a marathon block, yes. On race day most runners will want something lighter and quicker. Its best use is the long run itself, where the cushioning takes the sting out of the last hour. One lab rated it poorly as a racer.

It can be, if your feet suit the narrow fit. The soft ride and mid-range drop are forgiving, and it doesn't need fast legs to feel good. The catch is price: £150 RRP is a lot for a first pair, so check the price table for a discount before paying full whack.

The Megablast is the livelier shoe. One lab review pointed runners who want more rebound towards it, and on our spec sheet it's lighter and taller. The Neo Vista 3 is cheaper at RRP and makes more sense if protection matters more to you than pop.

If the 2's fit let you down, yes. The heel hold and length fixes are what reviewers noticed first. If the 2 fitted you well, the gains are smaller: a bit bouncier and more stable, and one reviewer called it a modest step rather than a big one.

Underfoot, very. One lab measured almost no outsole wear and one tester saw none in their early miles. The weak spot is the heel lining, which scored poorly for wear in lab testing.

The numbers

Specifications

Technical specifications for the Mizuno Neo Vista 3
CategorySuper Trainer
SurfaceRoad
Drop8.5mm
Heel Stack43.5mm
Forefoot Stack35mm
Weight266g
Carbon PlatedNo
StabilityNo
From the community

Community deals

No active deals right now

Set a price alert →